Fanaticism Exhibition

Commenting a Flood of Web Imagery

May God return Ramadan on Muslims with blessings and prosperity, Amen. I want to apologize in advance for the nature of this post, and the imagery content in it. I would have better started Ramadan with a more cheerful post. However, I felt being compiled to highlight the flood of devastating imagery available today everywhere online. The false image it reflects on Islam is painfully and offensively bad. I felt compiled as Muslim to comment on the inhumanity of fanaticism and compare it to the righteous Islam as we know it. Hereunder I display their ugliness, trying to compare it to the Real Islam.

Her eyes tell stories about the unmet dreams and the opposed ambitions. Again & Again. Concealing one's identity through face covering had never been averred neither in Quran nor in creditable Sonna of Apostle (pbuh). This is baseless in Islam. Nevertheless, the satans of fanaticism never stop energizing it all time and mandating it once they can. Their disturbed manhood wants always to conquer women through this disgracing appearance.

Horror Killing, such a thing they call "honor killing" had never been related to Islam, not only determined by the fact that it had outdated Islam by ages. Also as it stands against Quran verses stating women to be accountable for their acts before God. None has the right to end the life of a human except as a penalty of murder or terrorism as stated in Quran and Sonna. This is not Islamic, and shall never be acceptable by Islam or real Muslims.

Leave their innocence alone you mad ones. Let their childhood breath. Clearly Islam has nothing to do with this again. If the matter of adult women dress code was debatable in Islam, the matter of such a dress to kids had never been even discussed by the most fanatic jurists. It is a pure invention of the masculine fanatic madness. Wanted to acclimatize girls to this humility since their early childhood to kill any possibility of defiance in their minds and hearts. It is a nomadic mentality and patriarchal habits, only common in nomadic Asian societies, from where it creeped lately with the "Petroleum Civilization" values to other countries, Egypt being one.

Mullah Omar, the proclaimed "Prince of Muslims" in Afghanistan. To every Muslim I direct a question, Do you accept this decayed piece of shit to be your prince? Do you accept the frightened rat in Afghanistan humps to be your leader? Leadership in Islam as sampled by Muhammad (pbuh) selection of his leaders, was a pure secular process to select the best for bearing the designated task. Shall this apply to that thing? Surely it is not. He can be only proclaimed "Prince of Terrorists and Robbers"

As displeasing as Rasputin and the fanatic Rabbis of Jews. However, we can try being subjective. Let's try something. Call any young boy, below 9 years of age, and ask him to look in these faces, and try to figure out of these people are good or bad. Surely the agitating faces and the untamed looks will give the natural unbiased child the perception about demonic beasts. This is their factuality, they represent the man before civilization gets him out of the caves and the untamed compulsions and passions. Quran verses and credible Sunna condemn such a behavior in a way that leaves no doubt these people has a near zero knowledge of their own book and their own faith.

O' Europe and entire world, never listen to this, and never count September 11th as a Muslim act or a Muslim way expressing their cases. A real Muslim shall never rely on violence to express his case, save when his own homeland is invaded, like the case of Hizbullah. In this case only Muslims like any other patriot peoples shall carry an arm to free their land. We surely disagree to the humiliating Danish cartoons about Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). However, we believe the problem was not the cartoons, but the idea delivered to the artists motivating them to draw it. These fanatics and their falsehood based understanding lead to this, and only a civilized dialectic can corrects it.

As false as usual. Islam had never aimed to dominate the world. The early foundation of Islamic empire was a temporal act related to the nature of era.It was the time of empires, from Romans to Eastern Roman to Sassanids. However, we will find the 5th guided Caliph, "Omar ibn Abdulaziz" ceasing down the military augmentations, as he found it pointless in Islam after achieving the temporal power capable to protect the faith and the people in an esteemed temporal empire. Wars and empires in Islam was well understood by early Muslims as a temporal decisions that are related to the state not to religion. Islam did not rely on military acts in Asia for instance, where it dominated many countries without warfare. This shall also offset the sayings of orientalists claiming Islam was spread by sword and imposed on defeated nations. These fanatics mottoes only attest their talks unconsciously, against the real message in Quran and Sunna, affirming their shall be no obligations in matter of faith. More than 24 verses in Quran alone hammered on this eternal value in Islam.

When we demonstrate glorifying the Satan "Bin Laden", carrying his image and supporting his falsehood, what shall we expect the world to call us then? Terrorists I guess is the word. Bin Laden has nothing to do with Islam. He is a waste product of the Cold War, wherein he was employed with the other Afghani demons to fight for their CIA masters against Soviet union in Asia and Arab League. Safari club that included Sadat, Faisal, together with Afghani representatives and CIA leaders, resulted in what is called "The Arabic Afghan", Bin Laden and Zawahry being included. When shall we understand that Islam condemned terrorism and called for death penalty to terrorists. Islam nominated the risk of militias in "Heraba" penal code and asked Muslims to fight them. What do we need more to know they are neither Muslims nor Jihadists? Only a wasted US tool we can call them.

I understand the agitation of this man on seeing the cartoons humiliating our Prophet Muhammad, I also perceive such creations as uncivilized as it touches the holiness of others faiths. However, the word "BEHEAD" will do us not any good in our fair case. It shall only prove the claims against Muslims as terrorists and about Islam as a bloody sect. Is this fair? Is this what we want? Surely it is not. We should understand that liberty of innovation, and expression is unlimited and it should remain so in any country where prosperity is seek. Our way is to explain to others how Islam differs with the misleading image they receive from media everyday.

Jihad is our way! Surely it is, I affirm. But what we mean by "Jihad"? In language, Jihad means a persistent faithful effort. While Jihad as an Islamic term refers to "Persistent faithful effort paid to serve a moral objective beyond one's own self". Defending homeland is Jihad, fighting devils in life is Jihad, fighting terrorism and fanaticism with all the devils they bring to life is Jihad, also working hard to achieve humanity prosperity is Jihad. This is the sort of jihad I support and proclaim to be supported by Islam.

You moron creature. Are you happy as the reporters' cameras caught you throw a stone on whatever? Do you think you are a Muslim doing so? Do not you understand your stone had only harmed the face of Islam, the faith of peace that was deformed on hands of beasts like you to be perceived as a violent sect. And why you are dressed in white? White color in pilgrimage dress in Islam was to symbolize two things, one is the shroud, wherein someday we will all rest, therefore we remember life is not eternal. Second thing was purity and clarity of sins. If your heart carries the rage and hatred expressed in your face, you better dress in black therefore you look more self-harmonized.

My Goodness, the much misperceived penalty of "public adultery" in Islam. Yes, Islam did not assign a death penal for fornication as widely said, it was only for "public" adultery when committed by a married man. Imagine the social destructive effect of married man and married woman coupling in an extra-marital sexual act in public! How this shall offense the society? Their spouse surely being on top? It was for public acts as it is conditioned by 4 adult witnesses seeing the man's organ inserted in woman's genital. Can this ever happen but in public? Did those savages understood it this way? I doubt it. Moreover, all penal codes in Islam was a temporal matters related to the social development. Proved by the modifications done by Prophet Muhammad and Caliph "Omar Ibn Al-Khattab". Shall it be eternal? Apostle of God and his disciples would had never changed or accepted exceptions in it. Nevertheless, the savages of Pakistan followed the understanding of "Abu Ala Mawdodi" not the clear revealations of Islam.

God bless Hitler !!! Surely you must say so. It is you, but not Islam, who holds an ideology as fascistic as Hitler's one. It is you, not Islam, who carry the bloody hatred he had in his mind. It is you, not Islam, who should face the same destiny of Hitler, defeat and eradication from the modern world. This is your destiny sooner or later, God be my witness.

Body mutilation penal had always existed in nomadic tribal societies, as it was the only applicable penal among a nomad tribes moving after pasture wherever found. Moses law as well as Islamic law relied on it as the temporally reliable way. Shall this mean we can apply it today as is, in such a savage way? In Pakistan, Saudi and Afghanistan, is it applied to everyone, or only the simple poor thief, sparing the big sharks who are usually princes and generals? This is not Islam, and it cannot be. Apostle of God and Omar the Caliph both ceased cutting hands with a decision as governors when the environment became unsuitable for it. This is also what we must do today. It resembles a man who enucleates his eye after looking to a woman, and thinks he is applying Jesus teachings in this regard, literal understanding of teachings is stinky.

"Muslim Brothers", the gulf financed and US blessed stream someday in the past. Those who kept claiming modesty, until a militia demonstration took place in Azhar university few years ago, only to show they are as violent as others and as uncivilized as others. They were founded by a good man named "Banna" someday, only before they drift to a power seeking and a violent sect before he dies. They defied his orders and compiled him to write an article about them, the address was "Neither Brothers nor Muslims". This is how we find them till today.

Different but related. Opus Dei, a recognized sect by Vatican. From bloody rituals to discrimination against women, they match or exceed the Muslim fanatics. Needless to mention, someday in the past, Vatican itself burnt women alive on fake blasphemy accusations. Therefore, Christian friends should observe the stick in Vatican eyes before mocking the ashes in Islam fanaticism. Fanaticism did exist someday in the past and till now somewhere in every faith. Let all the modest persons stand together, condemning terrorism and fanaticism in all religions and all forms and shapes. Fanaticism has no religion at all, it is a black mass in man's heart calling him for hostility. Let us all face it together in one solid row.