28.5.07

إني رأيتك عنده

لشيوع خيانة الرجل للمرأة نسبياً، ننسى أحياناً أن المرأة قد تخون كأفظع ما تكون الخيانة، قصيدة عن مشهد الخيانة التقليدي جداً، مستوحاة من "لا تكذبي" لخالد الذكر "كامل الشناوي"، الشاعر الذي اكتوى بنار الخيانات العديدة ، لمجرد أنه كان أكثر رقة من أوغاد الوسط الفني على عهده، و كثيرا ما تنخدع المرأة ببريق الأوغاد
إنـــــــــــي رأيـــتك عــنده
عيـــــناك تفصـح عن دفينِ
عيـــــناك كــــــانتا تهمسان
تحاولان .. تتوســــــــــلان
تتذللان .. كالعــــــــــــنينِ
هَـجَرتِ عرشاً في جواري
و على قدمـــيه.. تركـــعين؟
تَرَكْــتِ عــزاً في زِمَـــامِي
و حــــذاءَ وَغْــــدٍ.. تلعقين؟
صَـــنَعتُكِ كــــــــــما أُريــد
و أراك اليـــوم كما تبـــغين
فكوني كما شئتِ دومــــــــاً
كوني طعاماً للكـــــــــــلاب
كــــوني أدام الفـــــــــاسقين
كوني مـــــبيتاً للهــــــــــوام
كوني حــوار الفاجـــــــرين
أو كوني كما كنت دومــــــاً
ســبيلاً .. للعـــــــــــــابرين
فمثلك لا تتــــوب عن الدنايا
لو جــــــــــاء يوم الـــــدين

EyaD
القاهرة – خريف 2005

21.5.07

Gender Equality in Islam-06

6. Narrated “Abu Huraira“: Apostle of God said “Superstitions of infections, bird spells, Safar month, and owls are all false, Superstitions are limited to Women, horses and houses”. Indexed by: Bukhary.

This hadieth is discredited in this specific narration, as it conflicts with many other hadieths of the Muhammad (pbuh), the evidences discrediting it are numerous, on top of it, the conflict with apostolic teachings regarding infections and sanitary precautions. Like, “If the plague spread in a city, then, whoever outside it shall not enter to it, and whoever within its boundaries should not get out.” In addition, “Better for a healthy man not to get exposed to a diseased one.” Then, it conflicts with many hadieths rejecting all the superstitions by any shape or form, like, “No superstitions and no spells by birds. And I like optimism.”

A final discrediting fact of this teaching, is what “Bukhary“ himself indexed after it, which was a totally opposing narration, with one word changing the meaning by 180 degrees, the teaching was narrated by “Aisha“ as “Before Islam, Superstitions were about Women, horses and houses” needless to mention the word “before Islam” lead to a totally different direction. Seemingly, the Apostle was explaining a wrong and mischievous believe of bedouins before Islam, when some of the attendees thought he was confirming it!

7. Apostle of God Said: “Women (as a source of shame) has two covers, marriage and grave” when asked which is better, he replied” the grave”.
Indexed by: Tabrany

8. Apostle of God Said: “Your worst enemy is your wife who shares your bed”
Indexed by: Tabrany

9. A woman asked Apostle of God about husbands’ rights, so if she can tolerate it she will marry, otherwise she will not, the Apostle said “Even if the woman shall drink a pus bleeding from her husband’s nose she did not give him his rights, and if I were to order human to apostate to human I would have ordered women to apostate to their husbands”
Indexed by: Bazzar

10. Apostle of God Said: “If women did not exist, God would have been faithfully worshipped”

11. Apostle of God Said: “I do not fear a threat to my people but women and wines”

12. Apostle of God Said: “Do not inhabit your women in comfortable homes, do not educate them, or grant them a plenty of clothing, and say ‘No’ frequently to them, as ‘Yes’ let them ask for more”
Indexed by: Al-Hakam

13. Apostle of God Said: “Keep them shorted in clothing, as if they got a plenty they like their looks and go out frequently”
Indexed by: Al-Hakam

14. Apostle of God Said: “A Good woman is rare among women”
Indexed by: Ibn Magah

15. Apostle of God Said: “Obedience to a woman leads to grief”
Indexed by: Ibn Asaker and Oqaily

16. Apostle of God Said: “Men were destroyed when the obeyed their women”
Indexed by: Ibn Asaker and Oqaily

17. Apostle of God Said: “Consult other men, if you find no one but a woman, consult here and do against what she advise”
Indexed by: Ibn Asaker

These claimed teachings were all discredited by Imam “Albany” may God bless him (died in 1999) for his efforts discrediting the wrong and mischievous hadieths, those are falsely linked to Muhammad (pbuh). He discredited it based on weaknesses in its linkage to profit by narrators and by conflicting contents, while many others before him had accepted and indexed it. Again, we list it here to know it is not linked to Muhammad (pbuh), and to understand that indexing a hadieth by one or more of the hadieth collectors was never a solid proof of its relation to apostle of God. As many hadieths were acceptable, only before Imam “Albany” discredits it with his own efforts in the 20th century.

18. Narrated “Osama ibn Zaid“: Apostle of God said: “I looked in Heavens, only to find the majority of its inhabitants are the poor, and looked into hells to find the majority of its inhabitants are women” Indexed by: Boukhary

19. Narrated “ibn Abbas“: Apostle of God said: “I looked into hells to find the majority of its inhabitants are women” Then women asked: Why Apostle of God? He replied “you do not admit goodness of your husbands, for a woman, if the man treated her superbly all time and did bad to her once, she only says ‘I had never had a good day with you’ “
Indexed by: Muslim

20. Narrated “Omran ibn Hossayn“: Apostle of God said: “O’ women, adhere to almsgiving frequently, as most of you will be the ashes of hells” Then a woman asked: Why Apostle of God? He replied “you frequently complain and you do not admit goodness of your husbands“
Indexed by: Bukhary

With all our respect to these honorable hadieths, we see it –if truly said by apostle- to be educational metaphors that should never be perceived as gender prejudicial destiny. It is obvious that apostle of God wanted to alarm against wrong behaviors among Medina women by that time, and we can say it exists today as well among both men and women, such behaviors like being frequent complainers or being ungrateful to partners …etc.

Shall this mean women are really the ashes of Jahanam?

We see this contradicting with many verses we listed before, wherewith God committed Himself to absolute justice among women and men based on their deeds. Moreover, contradicting with many of Muhammad’s teachings. e.g.:

- “May one of you have a grateful heart, a tongue glorifying God, and a good wife who supports him in god deeds”
Indexed by: Turmudi and ibn Magah.

- “Life is joyful, and the best of its joy is the good wife”
Indexed by: Muslim

- “If the woman prayed the five prayers, fasted in Ramadan, been faith to her husband, she will be let in afterlife, to choose the gate she wishes to heaven”
Indexed by: Al-Albany

We should also know, apostolic metaphors were not limited to women. He used it to educate husbands how to treat their spouses, as we will see in coming parts of this chapter.


21. Apostle of God Said: “A woman resembles a rib, if you tried to rectify her you will break her, you can only accept her as is”
Indexed by: Bukhary and Muslim

Shall it be surprising if we say this hadieth, we find to be very genuine and very true?

Apostle of God stated a very true statement that applies to both men and women. It is the fact you can get whenever you try changing the character of a mature adult. Usually, you can change some behavior of your partner, but you can never change his/her character, as defects are a human nature, and this is what the teaching means to us, it means nobody is perfect, and we need to accept other as they are, not as we wish them to be. Every human is subject of these defects, evidenced by the verse “And I do not claim myself non-guilty, one’s self usually pushes to wrong deeds” Josef: 53

One might wonder, why then the teaching is limited to women?

Most probably, it was directed to a complaining man, should it be a woman complaining about her husband’s style? Apostle would have told her the same about him.


22. Narrated “Abu Huraira“: Apostle of God said “Whoever a woman asked by her husband for matting and rejected, Angels shall condemn her until next morning”
Indexed by: Bukhary and Muslim- Agreed on

Here, we have an educational model that is not essentially meant literally. It is related to a specific social disease in patriarchal communities, where males control the economics of the family, and where women usually create pressure using their feminine talents to get what they want financially. The aim of the teaching then is to stop such behavior relating sexual life to financial gains, without essentially meaning the angels shall condemn her as it might be a metaphor to magnify how the behavior is unacceptable. Obviously, apostle found it unacceptable, as it first disregard women, putting her in a situation closed to selling her body for money, also it gives the sexually frustrated husband an excuse to seek sexual pleasure elsewhere, which shall alter the family stability.

The problem comes to surface, when some jurists uses this teaching to push a woman to respond to her husband’s desire apart from her emotional and physical status. I listened once to one of the so called “Satellite Imams” answering a woman, who were asked to make love to her husband after he bruised her! For my amazement, the Satellite Imam answered her with this teaching, asking her to respond positively whatever the conditions were. This, I find awkwardly inhuman, using the teaching in such an understanding, ignores another teaching of Apostle wherein he said, “I find the one of you beating his wife with a web like an animal, and then try to sleep with her by the end of the day! Doesn’t he ashamed from what he commits?”

Another wrong perception of this teaching is claimed by Sheikh “Yousif Qaradawy” a former Muslim Brotherhood Imam, who once said on satellite T.V. “Islam in this hadieth understood the fact that men usually cares more about sex, as males’ libido is usually much more intense compared to females’ one”. Needless to mention, what Sheikh “Qaradawy” said is an urban legend. Science proved sexual libido to be intense among both male and female. Its variations are mostly individual variations. Moreover, here, we raise a question,

Who said it is a right granted to men only?

One of the major teachings narrator, who is “ibn Abbas” once said, “I like to look neat to my wife as much as I want her to look to me”. And we have a plenty of teachings from apostle of God, educating men about foreplay, sexual rights of the wife and how God count it as good deeds for a man to take good care of his spouse desires…etc. So, Muhammad (pbuh) had understood several centuries ago the intimate relation to be bilateral, it takes two to tango.


23. “Whoever a woman used a perfume, and passed over a group of men, so that they could smell her essence, she is perceived as a fornicator”
Indexed by: Turmudi

“Women should not use perfumes when they go to mosques for prayer”
Indexed by: Turmudi

Shall this mean perfumes are prohibited for women outside?

If going out perfumed was unlawful to women, why did the apostle except Mosques? If she shall not use a perfume outdoors, whatever her direction was, why it was not said overtly?

We understand the first teaching to be related to the intention of seduction, limited to whoever uses a perfume to seduce a man or group of men deliberately, indicated by the word “so that” in this translation, that resembled the words “Le-yagedo” in Arabic. So, she is perceived as a fornicator as she intended seduction as pre-act to fornication. We find what is meant her is not the perfume, but the seductive style based on special agenda, whether it is about clothing, gait, gestures…etc. Accordingly, we understand the teaching as denouncement of deliberate seduction as a pre-act to adultery or fornication in general.

Second teaching is limited to preventing perfumes while going to mosque, aiming to avoid men distraction during worshipping, which is very understandable. And again, for us this does not mean prohibition of perfume usage outside home, as when you tell your son “O’ son, do not get your football inside the house” this will never mean you are preventing him from playing football, on the contrary, it can be considered as an indirect approval for playing football anywhere else but in the house.


24. “May God bless a man who hangs a web in his house, to behave his family with”
Indexed by: Muslim

Awkwardly Imam “Muslim” had indexed this teaching, while it contradicts with many others, these are:

- “You beat them, and only the worst of you do so”
Indexed by: Abou Dawod, Ibn Magah, and Nesai’y

- "Last night, many women visited my wife complaining you, their husbands are beating them, I swore to God, the good among you never do so, only the worst”
Indexed by: Abou Dawod, Ibn Magah, and Nesai’y

- “You beat them!!!, only the worst of you do so”
Indexed by Nesai’y

- “I hate seeing a man agitated and beating his wife”
Indexed by: Abou Dawod

Based on these four narrations we surely can discredit this “Web Teaching”. Leave alone its conflict with the “Marouf” concept in Quran and the deeds of Apostle treating his wives with superb kindness and intimacy.

25. Hereunder, I list some quotes, humiliating to women, and we find it listed in some orientalists’ writings and some websites as teachings of Muhammad (pbuh), while it is NOT, and have never been even claimed to be hadieths by whomsoever. We wanted to list it here to disambiguate about this, which is the same reason why we listed the discredited hadieths by Albany:

- “Women are your toys, so select for yourself”

- “Let them go to back rows, this is where God placed them”

- “Thank God, burial of a daughter is an honor”

- “Their minds in their genitals”

- “Three you do not rely-on, life, governor and woman”

- “Be cautious even from the good women”

- “The best woman, is the chastised masculine one”

- “A man will never be asked why he bet his spouse”

We started with this essential clarification and revision of the Holy Scriptures and its content related to woman, woman perception and woman rights, as it represents the major source of misperceptions common in Muslim societies about the subject. Despite its incoherence with Quran and righteous Sunnah, it is extensively narrated every day here or there in our mosques and over satellite channels.

Gender Equality in Islam-05


IV – MISINTERPRETED and MISNARRATED APOSTOLIC TEACHINGS

During the course of this section, we will list some hadieths as it is still extensively used by Muslim priests, despite the fact being discredited by enlightened jurists for ages, aiming only to disambiguate just in case any of the readers faced one of it. Other hadieths were not discredited based on its reference/linkage line to prophet, but we find its content to be conflicting with other teachings or deeds of the apostle or with Quran. In addition, we will discuss some teachings that is credited yet misinterpreted against women by many hadieth references.


1. Narrated “Moad ibn Jabal“: Apostle of God said “Bloodwit of a female is half of male bloodwit ”

Many Islamic jurists in the past as well as contemporary jurists has discredited this hadieth, due to its incoherence with Quran, directly stating about the case of unintentional murders “then let him set free a believing slave, and bloodwit is to be paid to his family unless they forgo it as a freewill offering” Woman: 92. No comment or gender discrimination has showed in the verse. Accordingly, the credibility of this hadieth was challenged.

2. Narrated “Abu Huraira“: Apostle of God said “Then prayer is interrupted by the passage of a woman, a donkey or a dog (meant in front of the praying man)
Indexed by: Muslim

Another narration of this hadieth escalated the list to contain 6 elements, the three above, plus a Jew, a magus, or a pig! We discredit this hadieth based on several evidences:

- “Aisha“, apostle’s wife, had discredited this hadieth once heard about it saying, “Do Abu Huraira set us along with dogs and donkeys? I swore to God I used to be sleeping and my feet near to apostle’s head when he prays” this narration from the apostle’s wife is surely contradicting “Abu Huraira“ narration. Therefore, “Aisha” was the first to discredit this teaching, with our due respect of the effort of Muslim verifying his index.

- The narration conflicts with the Quranic verses about equality of men and women. As well, the holy verse, “We have honored the Children of Adam” Transfer: 70. The claimed teaching, equalized humankind as Jews, Magi, and Muslim women to animals, which disregard humanity at large.

The teaching conflicts with the verses fostering other tolerance in Quran considering its narration including the Jew and the Magus in the loop. Indexed in “Bukhary”, “While Muhammad (pbuh) was setting among his disciples; a funeral of a Jew was passing. The Apostle of God then erected standing in respect. His disciples commented: He is a Jew O’ Apostle. Muhammad (pbuh) then replied, “O’ Almighty God, Isn’t he a human!”

- The narration also conflicts directly with all apostolic teachings honoring women as we detailed before in this chapter.

- The basic concept of prayer abortion due to passage of a living creature in front of the praying man is not logically tolerable. How men can avoid a dog or a donkey to pass while praying in an open air place? How he avoid it in rural areas? What is the distance enough to consider the dog passed away from him? Shall the man stop every person who passed while he prayed to ask if he is a Jew or a Magus?

3. Narrated “Anas ibn Malik:“: “Angasha“ was singing (nomadic songs for camels to speed up) and the women camels were speeding up, it was then when Apostle of God said “Slowdown ‘Angasha’, show kindness to the perfume vials (narrated Qawareer in Arabic) Indexed by: Muslim

This is such an honorable teaching, demonstrating how afar the apostolic kindness was from the regular bedouins. Amazingly, even this soft and tender teaching was not salvaged from the anti-feminine jurists. While the wording is very clear, showing the apostle to fear the over speeded camels might bother the women, therefore he asked “Angasha” to slowdown his rhythmic songs, and accordingly the camels, only in order to fit the tenderness of feminine built, expressed by apostle of God as “Perfume Vials” or “Qawareer”.


Yet, the anti-feminism found a way to turn it to the direct opposite. Here is how it was explained by Imam “Nawawy” who said about it “the women are usually weak, and their emotions can be easily tackled by soft songs of the camels’ nomad, then they become more vulnerable to commit adultery, as singing is a usual entry to fornication”.

Can any of us today imagine singing as the intro of adultery! Surely not many will do. It is the cultural and tempral gap separating us from the time and place of Imam “Nawawy”. However, such an explanation should not stand as blame on him, but on the overall environment that blessed the masculine approach to life. By the end of the day, the ancient jurists and interpreters were the product of their environment and time.

4. It is said the apostle of God have seen a woman whom he liked, so he went to his wife “Zainab”, while she was busy in a housekeeping matter, he practiced marital relation with her, then went out to his disciples, and said, “Women comes and goes as seducing as a Satan, whenever one among you watches a woman whom he likes, he should go to his wife and have sex with her, this is enough to control his desires, as they are all alike”
Indexed by: Muslim

O’ my apostle, O’ great messenger, and great leader. May you forgive us for what the sick minded among us has invented, and claimed to pertain to you?
Can any Muslim in the light of his knowledge of Muhammad’s life, imagine these words and that event to be rightly narrated?

Whoever thinks for a moment these words could belong to Muhammad (pbuh), shall answer the following questions:

- How can Muhammad (pbuh) who ordered men not to be staring on a woman do it himself?

- Who could get into Muhammad’s heart, to know that he saw a woman, and desired her, then went to his wife to have sex with her? Who shall see this internal dialogue and record it?

- Did the apostle tell about it? Have he told his disciples that he made love to one of his wives moments ago, specifically “Zainab”, is this possible while he himself, taught us that sexual relations between couples shall never be disclosed?

- The only possible scenario here is the apostle was sitting among his disciples, then saw the woman, then excused to make love to his wife, then showered and came back to his disciples, a scenario that takes almost an hour. Can you imagine the apostle doing so, while he was the spiritual and temporal leader of a prosperous nation?

- The apostle who loved “Khadija“ and equaled none to her, then loved “Aisha“ and favored her, knows for sure that all women are not alike. Nevertheless, whoever faked or drifted this teaching did not know. If apostle believed all women to be alike, why then he asked God to forgive him if he was not just emotionally, having no control over his heart? Shall the man who experienced love adopt the claimed “Vaginal” approach to women perception, telling all women are alike? Surely, we say no.

- If all women were alike, why the revelation of God approved and regarded the human feelings in the verses related to prophet’s marriage to “Zainab bent Gahsh” whose name is included in the claimed hadieth? Muhammad married her after he liked her as stated in Quran. It was then when God blamed him for trying to ignore his feelings. How we are expected to see this coherent with Muhammad (pbuh) saying “all women are alike”


***
The story of “Zainab bent Gahsh” is such a controversial one, as many orientalists had undermined the apostle of Islam using it. Therefore, we will take a minute to explain it. The woman was married to “Zaid ibn Haretha”, the adopted son of Muhammad (pbuh). When Muhammad passed his adopted son at home, knocking the door,”Zainab”opened, informing that ”Zaid” was not at home. Then Muhammad (pbuh) turned his face and left her saying, “My Almighty Allah, You who turns man’s heart”. Obviously he liked the woman when he saw her, this is exactly why he wanted to make the situation shorter leaving her on spot.

On the other hand,”Zaid” was not satisfied with his wife, as she was a daughter of a leading clan in Quraish, and has a degree of kinship to Muhammad (pbuh), while he was a non-rooted man in this tribal community. He used to complain to Muhammad (pbuh) from her superior behavior, as she feels too noble to be his wife. Muhammad (pbuh) whenever hears this from him after the event of seeing her, he used to tell him “fear God O’ Zaid and keep consorting to your wife”. The Apostle did not want to accept ”Zaid” divorcing his wife as he feared if he did, maybe it is his ego, him Muhammad, who wanted this, so he used to affirm rejection, and this is typically what an honorable man shall do in such a situation.

It is valuable to say, it was quite uncommon for a man to marry his adopted son’s divorcee. The status remained so, until God revealed to his Apostle “When you said to him whom God had blessed and you had favored, ’Keep your wife, and fear God,’ and you were concealing within yourself what God should reveal, fearing other men; and God has better right for you to fear Him. So when Zaid had his husbandry rights with her, then We gave her in marriage to you, so that there should not be any fault in the believers, touching the wives of their adopted sons” The Clans: 37.

While orientalists use this verse to undermine Quranic divinity, claiming Quran to be satisfying Muhammad’s needs and wishes. We find it a standalone proof on the divinity of Quran. Shall everyone imagine himself in the same situation; he would have never liked Quran to reveal what he hides, especially about something not very acceptable socially. when a man is in the role and status of an Apostle and a leader at a time, he will hate such a social liability.
***


5. Meeting a group of men coming from Persia, Apostle asked them, who became the king of Persians, they replied, they had crowned a woman. Then Apostle of God said, “Shall never prosper a nation wherein a woman leads” later on, we found apostle’s prophecy to be true, as the Rums had defeated Persians.
Indexed by: Bukhary, Turmudi, Nesa’iy and Ahmed.

Leaving alone the conflict of this hadieth equality concept in Quran, we shall discredit it based on a unique evidence, a historical one.

Historical Evidence of Falsehood:

- The Sassanid Empire was established by “Ardashir I“ (226–241), and it is worthy to say that the title “Kesra” is an imaginary Arab title that had never existed in Sassanid era, it was most probably mislead by the name of some Persian kings named “Khosrau I” and “Khosrau II”. The Sassanid kings has always adopted the title of “Shāhanshāh” or “King of Kings”

Hereunder, the time frames of the Sassanid kings succession:

Ardashir I 224 to 241, Peroz I 457 to 484 , Shapur I 241 to 272 , Balash 484 to 488 , Hormizd I 272 to 273 , Kavadh I 488 to 531 , Bahram I 273 to 276 , Djamasp 496 to 498 , Bahram II 276 to 293, Khosrau I 531 to 579 , Bahram III 293 , Hormizd IV 579 to 590, Narseh 293 to 302 , Bahram Chobin 590 to 591, Hormizd II 302 to 310 , Khosrau II 591 to 628 , Shapur II 310 to 379 ,Kavadh II 628 ,Ardashir II 379 to 383, Ardashir III 628 to 630, Shapur III 383 to 388 ,Shahrbaraz 630 ,Bahram IV 388 to 399, Purandokht 630 to 631, Yazdegerd I 399 to 420, Azarmidokht 631- 632 ,Bahram V 420 to 438 ,Hormizd VI 631 to 632, Yazdegerd II 438 to 457, Yazdgerd III 632 to 651 ,Hormizd III 457 to 459 ,

- The period of Muhammad (pbuh) life and Quran revelation lies all within the Sassanid dynasty period. Therefore, whoever the claimed empress shall be, she must be one of the Sassanid Empresses. Persia witnessed only a couple of Sassanid Empresses as we see in the table, first was “Purandokht” who ruled between 630-631, and her sister “Azarmidokht” who ruled between 631 and 632. Each for as little as two years.

- The defeats of Persians in front of Byzantines happened all during the 6 years war lead by “Heraclius“ against Sassanids between 622-628 AD, and ended with the Persians greater defeat in the “Battle of Nineveh“, where “Khosrau II“ was the ruling King of Persia. Therefore, he was a man who led not a woman, and no woman had ever set on the Sassanid throne before the defeat in “Nineveh“!

- Both Empresses, specially the first was recorded in Sassanid history as good Empresses. Tried her best to control the Empire after defeats, and stored it through a temporal peace settlement with Byzantines.

According to these historical facts, we find the possibilities of this hadieth limited to be said in another occasion, other than what was stated by the narrator, or to be totally fake one. Adding to this historical factor, the teaching conflict with other apostolic teachings, leave alone its contradiction with Quran, we find the highest possibility is that it did not pertain to Apostle Muhammad at all.

Over the coming post, we shall explore more surprizing facts about the claimed teachings dishonoring women.